Standout features established in e-payment decree
Standout features established in e-payment decree
Decree No.52/2024/ND-CP, regulating non-cash payments, provides a clear definition for electronic money in Vietnam as “the equivalent value in VND stored electronically”, based on pre-paid funds provided to banks or payment service organisations offering electronic wallet services. These regulations have far-reaching implications for all stakeholders in the payment industry.
However, some public expectations remain unmet, particularly regarding the formal recognition of virtual currencies, virtual assets, and similar types of digital assets. Addressing these gaps will be crucial for fostering a comprehensive and modern financial ecosystem in Vietnam.
For the first time, the Vietnamese legal framework formally under Decree 52 that electronic money is “the value of Vietnamese currency co-stored on electronic means provided on a reciprocal basis with the amount prepaid by customers to banks, foreign bank branches, and intermediary payment service providers providing e-wallet services”. This definition establishes electronic money as a digital form of VND.
Decree 52 specifies two primary methods for storing electronic money: e-wallets and prepaid cards. The provision and use of these methods are governed by specific regulatory requirements outlined by the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV), covering various aspects such as eligible users, principles for providing and using the services, the scope of services, and obligations of the parties involved, including data protection and reporting.
Despite earlier drafts hinting at its inclusion, Decree 52 excludes mobile money as a storage method. The sandbox period for mobile money has been extended until December 31. This extension likely explains why mobile money is not included in the current decree, as the outcomes of the sandbox are still pending.
Entities authorised to provide electronic money under Decree 52 include banks, foreign bank branches (offering e-wallet and prepaid card services), and intermediary payment service providers (offering e-wallet services linked to customers’ payment accounts at the payment service providers). Intermediary payment service providers must ensure that the total balance on all accounts guaranteeing payment for e-wallet services opened at banks and foreign bank branches is not lower than the total balance of all e-wallets issued to customers.
On a side note, as shared by a representative of the SBV, with electronic money now defined as a digital form of Vietnam’s legal currency, different legal terms are expected to be used for virtual currencies and digital. This distinction aims to help eliminate illegal payment methods by clearly separating legitimate electronic money from other digital assets.
To address the complexities of international payments, Decree 52 establishes a detailed framework aimed at enhancing competition and addressing reliance on international payment gateways and card organisations, which has led to reduced competition and disparities. Additionally, cross-border money transfer services such as Western Union and MoneyGram lack specific legal regulations for licensing and commercial presence.
The introduced framework for banks and intermediary payment service providers outlines several key points. These entities can participate in international payment systems upon meeting specified conditions, subject to written approval by the SBV.
Foreign entities offering payment services to non-residents and foreign residents in Vietnam for goods and services transactions must do so through commercial banks or foreign bank branches approved by the SBV to join their international payment systems.
Except for financial switching service providers, intermediary providers can offer payment services for international transactions. Payments and settlements for these transactions must be conducted through commercial banks or foreign bank branches authorised by the SBV for foreign exchange activities in international markets.
The new decree also emphasises stringent compliance requirements for all international payments. Providers must adhere to regulations concerning foreign exchange management, user data protection, cybersecurity, tax management, anti-money laundering, and counter-terrorism financing. Additionally, conformity with international agreements and treaties on payments that Vietnam participates in is mandatory.
Payment accounts are also under the spotlight, with enhanced regulations reflecting updated practices related to opening and using payment accounts, authorisation for account use, freezing payment accounts and post-unfreeze processing, and account closure. These updates ensure clearer guidelines, greater security, and more flexibility in management.
From a public perspective, one of the standout features may be the introduction of new rules for freezing payment accounts. The SBV mandates that payment service providers freeze accounts with evidence of fraud or legal violations. Additionally, in cases of mistaken fund transfers, doing this enables customers to recover their misdirected funds, addressing a significant public concern.
Initially, it was proposed that foreign investors could hold a maximum ownership ratio of 49 per cent (both directly and indirectly) in intermediary payment service providers. However, this provision was ultimately omitted from Decree 52.
Although the foreign ownership cap was not included in the decree, the initial proposal still highlights the cautious approach of state authorities. Intermediary payment services remain an uncommitted sector in Vietnam’s commitments to international treaties to which it is a member.
It is also classified as a conditional business investment sector. Thus, when seeking approval for the acquisition of shares or contributed capital by foreign investors in relevant intermediary payment service providers, it is common practice for application dossiers to be meticulously scrutinised by state authorities.
