Law on bad debt settlement urgently needed: experts
Law on bad debt settlement urgently needed: experts
Experts said a law on bad debt settlement should be put in place before two regulations expire in six months.
Can Van Luc, chief economist at BIDV, is concerned that Circular No.14 and Resolution No.42, which regulate bad debts in the banking system, will soon expire.
He believes a law on bad debt settlement should be introduced to fill the legal gap left by their expiration, or unregulated bad debts will pile up, destablising the economy.
“Bad debts are expected to soar in the second half of 2022 and continue to rise faster in the following years unless a legal mechanism for bad debt settlement is set up in time,” Luc said.
Without such a mechanism, the bad debt ratio will climb to 2.3 to 2.5 per cent this year and rise higher from 2024.
The economist proposed a two-step plan to facilitate the rollout of such a law.
First, it is necessary to extend the resolution for three more years to have enough time to prepare for a draft.
Second, lawmakers formulate the law in line with international practices and, simultaneously, make it suitable for the banking system.
In the meantime, amendments to the resolution should also be made to address its shortcomings, which include the absence of a formal debt trading market, difficulties in debt and collateral valuation, and issues related to the seizure of collateral.
Hoang Van Cuong, a National Assembly deputy, said that the Resolution No.42 had helped banks settle bad debts at a faster pace.
With the resolution, bad debts in the banking system were handled at an average rate of VND7.15 trillion (US$313.6 million) per month, much higher than the rate of VND3.63 trillion per month previously.
However, he underlined the nature of the resolution, which is just a pilot legal document of five years, pointing to its shortcomings and stressed the need for a more comprehensive law on bad debt settlement.
“Resolution No.42 remains in effect over just five years. Many debtors take advantage of such a short duration to circumvent the resolution,” he said.
“The resolution stipulates that credit contracts include a provision for the seizure of collateral. Unfortunately, credit contracts prior to the resolution did not include such a provision, falling outside its scope.”
Nguyen Quoc Hung, general secretary of Viet Nam Banks Association, acknowledged that the Resolution No.42 had stepped up the settlement of bad debts for nearly five years.
Nevertheless, he said that there still existed some shortcomings in the resolution that render it inapplicable in many cases.
“Almost no bank has successfully applied simplified processes to resolve contract-related disputes. The reason is that Article 8 of the resolution is applicable only to collateral-related disputes and has yet to cover the broader contract-related disputes. As a result, the court has no legal grounds to invoke such a process to resolve contract-related disputes," Hung said.
The secretary called for amendments to the resolution to address the shortcomings and develop the resolution into a full-fledged law that moves the bad debt settlement process faster.
Truong Thanh Duc, a lawyer at ANVI Law Firm, revealed that the Resolution No.42 was due to expire in mid-August, 2022.
He believes the expiration will cause additional problems to the banking system, which was facing mounting bad debts during the pandemic.
Accordingly, a law on bad debt settlement is considered necessary to enable banks to continue resolving bad debts at a fast rate.
"In case such a law is not introduced or not introduced in time, the resolution should be extended," Duc added.
In that case, it is recommended to extend the resolution for at least 5-10 years, until legal cases related to bad debts could be quickly and effectively resolved in courts of law.
By late 2021, the banking system has managed to settle over VND1.3 quadrillion ($57 billion) of bad debts, of which VND369.9 trillion are bad debts under the Resolution No.42.
Bad debts ratio stayed at 1.9 per cent last year, increasing 0.21 percentage points against 2020.
